4.7 Article

Time course of gene expression in rat experimental autoimmune myocarditis

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 103, 期 6, 页码 623-632

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS
DOI: 10.1042/cs1030623

关键词

cardiomyopathy; gene expression; myocarditis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic responses that characterize experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) have not yet been determined. To investigate gene expression in the myocardium of EAM, absolute copy numbers of 44 mRNA species [calcium-handling proteins, contractile proteins, natriuretic peptides (NPs), cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system, endothelins (ETs) and extracellular matrix] in synthesized cDNA from a fixed quantity of total heart RNA were assessed using real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR at days 0, 14, 21 and 28 after immunization. alpha-Cardiac myosin showed a 26.3-fold decrease and beta-cardiac myosin a 3.75-fold increase at day 14. Atrial NP and brain NP increased 47.7- and 6.35-fold at days 21 and 14 respectively. Angiotensin II type I receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme and ETI increased 22.3-fold at day 21, 6.30-fold at day 21 and 16.8-fold at day 14 respectively. Aldosterone receptor decreased 2.15-fold at day 14, but aldosterone synthetase was detected only at days 14 and 21. Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-10, interferon-gamma and monocyte chemo-attractant protein-I increased 9.08-fold at day 14, 398-fold at day 21, 43.1-fold at day 14 and 142-fold at day 14 respectively. Collagen type 3, collagen type I and fibronectin increased 34.6-, 1.74- and 44.4-fold respectively at day 21. Interestingly, osteopontin showed a 4540-fold increase and it was the highest mRNA of all at day 14. An isoform of cardiac myosin and NP are dramatically changed in EAM. RAA system and ET expressions are changed differently during the EAM time course. Cytokine, chemokine and extracellular matrix greatly increase and, in particular, large numbers. of osteopontin mRNA are expressed in early EAM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据