4.4 Article

Estrogen receptor α influences socially motivated behaviors

期刊

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 484-491

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1837

关键词

plus maze; open field; T-maze; social recognition; anxiolytic; anxiogenic; serotonin; corticosterone

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD072323] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH57759, KO2 MH01349] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Male mice lacking estrogen receptor a (ERalphaKO) show reduced social behaviors. We hypothesized that this might be due to either socially elicited or generalized anxiety. Male ERalphaKOs and wild type (WT) mice were given a series of behavioral tests: elevated plus maze, T-maze, and social recognition. Each test included a social dimension by exposing males to ovariectomized (OVX) females. In addition plasma concentrations of corticosterone were measured, and open field activity was assessed. In the elevated plus maze, WT males exposed to an OVX female 1 min prior to the test were more anxious than WT controls. ERaKO males showed anxiety in this test whether or not they were preexposed to a female. In the T-maze, WT males increased exploration of a novel arm when it contained an OVX female. The presence or absence of a female in a novel arm did not affect behavior of ERaKO males. In social recognition tests, ERalphaKO males spent less time than WT littermates investigating an OVX female that was repeatedly introduced into their home cage. On the final trial, when a novel female was introduced, WT males increased their chemo-investigation but ERaKOs did not. Plasma corticosterone levels were lower in ERaKO than in WT males when plasma was taken directly after a brief (control) cage disturbance. In the open field WT and ERaKO males behaved essentially the same. Taken together, the results of these experiments suggest the ERaKO males avoid contact with other conspecifics, perhaps due to an inability to be aroused by social cues. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据