4.6 Article

Dust size distributions in coagulation/fragmentation equilibrium: numerical solutions and analytical fits

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 525, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015228

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; stars: pre-main-sequence; circumstellar matter; planets and satellites: formation; protoplanetary disks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Grains in circumstellar disks are believed to grow by mutual collisions and subsequent sticking due to surface forces. Results of many fields of research involving circumstellar disks, such as radiative transfer calculations, disk chemistry, magneto-hydrodynamic simulations largely depend on the unknown grain size distribution. Aims. As detailed calculations of grain growth and fragmentation are both numerically challenging and computationally expensive, we aim to find simple recipes and analytical solutions for the grain size distribution in circumstellar disks for a scenario in which grain growth is limited by fragmentation and radial drift can be neglected. Methods. We generalize previous analytical work on self-similar steady-state grain distributions. Numerical simulations are carried out to identify under which conditions the grain size distributions can be understood in terms of a combination of power-law distributions. A physically motivated fitting formula for grain size distributions is derived using our analytical predictions and numerical simulations. Results. We find good agreement between analytical results and numerical solutions of the Smoluchowski equation for simple shapes of the kernel function. The results for more complicated and realistic cases can be fitted with a physically motivated black box recipe presented in this paper. Our results show that the shape of the dust distribution is mostly dominated by the gas surface density (not the dust-to-gas ratio), the turbulence strength and the temperature and does not obey an MRN type distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据