4.6 Article

The nature of dark gamma-ray bursts

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 526, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015458

关键词

gamma-rays burst: general; techniques: photometric

资金

  1. DFG [Kl 766/13-2, SA 2001/2-1, HA 1850/28-1]
  2. MPE
  3. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch-Dienst (DAAD)
  4. STFC [PP/C002229/1, ST/H004157/1, ST/H004165/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H004157/1, PP/C002229/1, ST/H00243X/1, ST/H004165/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Thirteen years after the discovery of the first afterglows, the nature of dark gamma-ray bursts (GRB) still eludes explanation: while each long-duration GRB typically has an X-ray afterglow, optical/NIR emission is only seen for 40-60% of them. Aims. Here we use the afterglow detection statistics of the systematic follow-up observations performed with GROND since mid-2007 in order to derive the fraction of dark bursts according to different methods, and to distinguish between various scenarios for dark bursts. Methods. Observations were performed with the 7-channel Gamma-Ray Optical and Near-infrared Detector (GROND) at the 2.2 m MPI/ESO telescope. We used the afterglow detection rate in dependence on the delay time between GRB and the first GROND exposure. Results. For long-duration Swift bursts with a detected X-ray afterglow, we achieve a 90% (35/39) detection rate of optical/NIR afterglows whenever our observations started within less than 240 min after the burst. Complementing our GROND data with Swift/XRT spectra we construct broad-band spectral energy distributions and derive rest-frame extinctions. Conclusions. We detect 25-40% dark bursts, depending on the definition used. The faint optical afterglow emission of dark bursts is mainly due to a combination of two contributing factors: (i) moderate intrinsic extinction at moderate redshifts, and (ii) about 22% of dark bursts at redshift >5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据