4.6 Article

Evaporation of the planet HD 189733b observed in H I Lyman-α

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 514, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913347

关键词

planetary systems; stars: individual: HD 189733

资金

  1. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) [NT05- 4_44463]
  3. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
  4. HST-GO-10869.01-A

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We observed three transits of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b in H I Lyman-alpha and in a few other lines in the ultraviolet with HST/ACS, in the search for atmospheric signatures. We detect a transit signature in the Lyman-alpha light curve with a transit depth of 5.05 +/- 0.75%. This depth exceeds the occultation depth produced by the planetary disk alone at the 3.5 sigma level (statistical). Other stellar emission lines are less bright, and, taken individually, they do not show the transit signature, while the whole spectra redward of the Lyman-alpha line has enough photons to show a transit signature consistent with the absorption by the planetary disk alone. The transit depth's upper limits in the emission lines are 11.1% for OI lambda 1305 angstrom and 5.5% for C II lambda 1335 angstrom lines. The presence of an extended exosphere of atomic hydrogen around HD 189733b producing 5% absorption of the full unresolved Lyman-alpha line flux shows that the planet is losing gas. The Lyman-alpha light curve is well-fitted by a numerical simulation of escaping hydrogen in which the planetary atoms are pushed by the stellar radiation pressure. We constrain the escape rate of atomic hydrogen to be between 10(9) and 10(11) g s(-1) and the ionizing extreme UV flux between 2 and 40 times the solar value (1-sigma), with higher escape rates corresponding to larger EUV flux. The best fit is obtained for dM/dt = 10(10) g s(-1) and an EUV flux F-EUV = 20 times the solar value. HD 189733b is the second extrasolar planet for which atmospheric evaporation has been detected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据