4.6 Article

The CO luminosity and CO-H2 conversion factor of diffuse ISM: does CO emission trace dense molecular gas?

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 518, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014510

关键词

ISM: molecules; ISM: clouds

资金

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-BLAN-0231-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We wish to separate and quantify the CO luminosity and CO-H-2 conversion factor applicable to diffuse but partially-molecular ISM when H-2 and CO are present but C+ is the dominant form of gas-phase carbon. Methods. We discuss galactic lines of sight observed in HI, HCO+ and CO where CO emission is present but the intervening clouds are diffuse (locally A(V) less than or similar to 1 mag) with relatively small CO column densities N-CO less than or similar to 2 x 10(16) cm(-2). We separate the atomic and molecular fractions statistically using EB-V as a gauge of the total gas column density and compare N-H2 to the observed CO brightness. Results. Although there are H-2-bearing regions where CO emission is too faint to be detected, the mean ratio of integrated CO brightness to N-H2 for diffuse ISM does not differ from the usual value of 1 K km s(-1) of integrated CO brightness per 2 x 10(20) H-2 cm(-2). Moreover, the luminosity of diffuse CO viewed perpendicular to the galactic plane is 2/3 that seen at the Solar galactic radius in surveys of CO emission near the galactic plane. Conclusions. Commonality of the CO-H-2 conversion factors in diffuse and dark clouds can be understood from considerations of radiative transfer and CO chemistry. There is unavoidable confusion between CO emission from diffuse and dark gas and misattribution of CO emission from diffuse to dark or giant molecular clouds. The character of the ISM is different from what has been believed if CO and H-2 that have been attributed to molecular clouds on the verge of star formation are actually in more tenuous, gravitationally-unbound diffuse gas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据