4.0 Article

Isolation and characterization of bone marrow multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 46, 期 12, 页码 3349-3360

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.10696

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. There is an increased interest in rheumatology in mesenchymal progenitor/stem cells (MPCs) and their roles in rheumatic diseases, but little is known about the phenotype of these cells in vivo. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize human bone marrow (BM) MPCs. Methods. Fluorescence microscopy was used to identify putative MPCs among adherent BM cells. To purify them, a positive selection with antifibroblast microbeads was used, combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for microbead+,CD45(low) cells. A more detailed phenotype of these cells was determined using 4-color flow cytometry, and standard chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic assays were used to investigate their differentiation potentials. Results. Putative MPCs microscopically identified as large, fibroblast-like, D7-FIB+ cells were purified using positive selection with W-FIB-conjugated (antifibroblast) microbeads followed by FACS for specifically bound microbead+,CD45(low) cells. These cells represented 0.01% of mononuclear cells in the BM. They were uniformly positive for CD105, LNGFR, HLA-DR, CD10, CD13, CD90, STRO-1, and bone morphogenetic protein receptor type IA (BMPRIA) and were negative for CD14, CD34, CD117, and CD133. Only cells with this phenotype could proliferate and produce adherent cell monolayers capable of chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. D7-FIB- cells in the BM lacked any MPC activity. Uncultured skin fibroblasts had a phenotype similar to that of BM MPCs, but were negative for LNGFR, STRO-1, HLA-DR, and BMPRIA. Conclusion. This study shows the distinct phenotype, morphology, and method of isolation of BM MPCs. The findings may have implications for defining the physiologic roles of MPCs in arthritis, bone diseases, and joint regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据