4.6 Article

PACS and SPIRE spectroscopy of the red supergiant VY CMa

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 518, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014641

关键词

line: identification; stars: chemically peculiar; circumstellar matter; stars: mass-loss; supergiants

资金

  1. BMVIT (Austria)
  2. ESA-PRODEX (Belgium)
  3. CEA/CNES (France)
  4. DLR (Germany)
  5. ASI (Italy)
  6. CICT/MCT (Spain)
  7. CSA (Canada)
  8. NAOC (China)
  9. CEA, CNES, CNRS (France)
  10. MCINN (Spain)
  11. SNSB (Sweden)
  12. STFC (UK)
  13. NASA (USA)
  14. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office of ESA
  15. Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (FWO)
  16. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P18939-N16, I163-N16]
  17. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P18939] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  18. STFC [ST/G002827/1, ST/H008543/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  19. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002827/1, PP/E001181/1, ST/H008543/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With a luminosity > 10(5) L-circle dot and a mass-loss rate of similar to 2 x 10(-4) M-circle dot yr(-1), the red supergiant VY CMa truly is a spectacular object. Because of its extreme evolutionary state, it could explode as supernova any time. Studying its circumstellar material, into which the supernova blast will run, provides interesting constraints on supernova explosions and on the rich chemistry taking place in such complex circumstellar envelopes. We have obtained spectroscopy of VY CMa over the full wavelength range offered by the PACS and SPIRE instruments of Herschel, i.e. 55-672 micron. The observations show the spectral fingerprints of more than 900 spectral lines, of which more than half belong to water. In total, we have identified 13 different molecules and some of their isotopologues. A first analysis shows that water is abundantly present, with an ortho-to-para ratio as low as similar to 1.3:1, and that chemical non-equilibrium processes determine the abundance fractions in the inner envelope.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据