4.6 Article

Herschel PACS and SPIRE imaging of CW Leonis

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 518, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014658

关键词

circumstellar matter; stars: AGB and post-AGB; stars: carbon; stars: mass-loss; stars: individual: CW Leo

资金

  1. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office of ESA
  2. BMVIT (Austria)
  3. ESA-PRODEX (Belgium)
  4. CEA (France)
  5. CNES (France)
  6. DLR (Germany)
  7. ASI (Italy)
  8. CICT (Spain)
  9. MCT (Spain)
  10. CSA (Canada)
  11. NAOC (China)
  12. CNRS (France)
  13. MCINN (Spain)
  14. SNSB (Sweden)
  15. STFC (UK)
  16. NASA (USA)
  17. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P18939-N16, I163-N16]
  18. STFC [ST/G002827/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  19. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001181/1, ST/G002827/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P18939] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herschel PACS and SPIRE images have been obtained over a 30' x 30' area around the well-known carbon star CW Leo (IRC + 10 216). An extended structure is found in an incomplete arc of similar to 22' diameter, which is cospatial with the termination shock due to interaction with the interstellar medium (ISM) as defined by Sahai & Chronopoulos from ultraviolet GALEX images. Fluxes are derived in the 70, 160, 250, 350, and 550 mu m bands in the region where the interaction with the ISM takes place, and this can be fitted with a modified black body with a temperature of 25 +/- 3 K. Using the published proper motion and radial velocity for the star, we derive a heliocentric space motion of 25.1 km s(-1). Using the PACS and SPIRE data and the analytical formula of the bow shock structure, we infer a de-projected standoff distance of the bow shock of R-0 = (8.0 +/- 0.3) x 10(17) cm. We also derive a relative velocity of the star with respect to the ISM of (106.6 +/- 8.7)/ root n(ISM) km s (1), where n(ISM) is the number density of the local ISM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据