4.6 Article

The RMS survey: far-infrared photometry of young massive stars

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 510, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913319

关键词

stars: formation; stars: pre-main sequence; HII regions; infrared: general; techniques: photometric; surveys

资金

  1. Science and Technologies Research Council of the United Kingdom (STFC)
  2. STFC [ST/F002092/1, PP/E001149/1, ST/H002391/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001149/1, ST/H002391/1, ST/F002092/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The Red MSX Source (RMS) survey is a multi-wavelength campaign of follow-up observations of a colour-selected sample of candidate massive young stellar objects (MYSOs) in the galactic plane. This survey is returning the largest well-selected sample of MYSOs to date, while identifying other dust contaminant sources with similar mid-infrared colours including a large number of new ultra-compact (UC) HII regions. Aims. To measure the far-infrared (IR) flux, which lies near the peak of the spectral energy distribution (SED) of MYSOs and UCHII regions, so that, together with distance information, the luminosity of these sources can be obtained. Methods. Less than 50% of RMS sources are associated with IRAS point sources with detections at 60 mu m and 100 mu m, though the vast majority are visible in Spitzer MIPSGAL or IRAS Galaxy Atlas (IGA) images. However, standard aperture photometry is not appropriate for these data due to crowding of sources and strong spatially variable far-IR background emission in the galactic plane. A new technique using a 2-dimensional fit to the background in an annulus around each source is therefore used to obtain far-IR photometry for young RMS sources. Results. Far-IR fluxes are obtained for a total of 1113 RMS candidates identified as young sources. Of these 734 have flux measurements using IGA 60 mu m and 100 mu m images and 724 using MIPSGAL 70 mu m images, with 345 having measurements in both data sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据