4.6 Article

The XMM-LSS survey: optical assessment and properties of different X-ray selected cluster classes

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 526, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015182

关键词

surveys; galaxies: clusters: general; large-scale structure of Universe; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

资金

  1. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  2. Communaute francaise de Belgique - Actions de recherche concertees - Academie universitaire Wallonie-Europe
  3. FONDAP Center for Astrophysics [15010003]
  4. FONDECYT [1085267]
  5. ESA PRODEX Programme XMM-LSS
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001203/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [PP/E001203/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. XMM and Chandra opened a new area for the study of clusters of galaxies not only for cluster physics, but also for the detection of faint and distant clusters that were inaccessible with previous missions. Aims. This article presents 66 spectroscopically confirmed clusters (0.05 <= z <= 1.5) within an area of 6 deg(2) enclosed in the XMM-LSS survey. Almost two thirds have been confirmed with dedicated spectroscopy only and 10% have been confirmed with dedicated spectroscopy supplemented by literature redshifts. Methods. Sub-samples, or classes, of extended-sources are defined in a two-dimensional X-ray parameter space allowing for various degrees of completeness and contamination. We describe the procedure developed to assess the reality of these cluster candidates using the CFHTLS photometric data and spectroscopic information from our own follow-up campaigns. Results. Most of these objects are low-mass clusters, hence constituting a still poorly studied population. In a second step, we quantify the correlations between the optical properties such as richness or velocity dispersion and the cluster X-ray luminosities. We examine the relation of the clusters to the cosmic web. Finally, we review peculiar compact structures in the surveyed area such as very distant clusters and fossil groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据