4.6 Article

Keratinocyte growth factor pretreatment is associated with decreased macrophage inflammatory protein-2α concentrations and reduced neutrophil recruitment in acid aspiration lung injury

期刊

SHOCK
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 501-506

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00024382-200212000-00003

关键词

pulmonary inflammation; PMN; chemokine gradient; two-hit model; KC

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 44918] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A two-hit model of acid aspiration was used to examine the effect of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) on chemokine levels and neutrophil recruitment into the lung. Mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture and then either KGF or saline, intratracheally (IT). Forty-eight hours later, the mice were given IT acid. After 8 h, neutrophil counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid were significantly decreased in animals pretreated with KGF (23 +/- 4 x 10(3)/mouse) compared with saline (74 +/- 2 x 10(3)/mouse). In addition, the BALfluid IL-6 levels were decreased in the KGF-treated group (88 +/- 44 pg/mL) compared with the saline group (166 +/- 34 pg/mL). To examine the mechanism behind the KGF-induced reduction in neutrophil influx, the murine chemokines KC and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2alpha were measured. KC levels in plasma and BAL fluid were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Likewise, levels of MIP-2alpha in plasma were not affected by KGF treatment. However, 8 h after acid aspiration, MIP-2alpha concentrations were significantly lower in the KGF-treated group. The ratio of MIP-2alpha in BAL fluid versus plasma was lower in the KGF group (0.72 +/- 0.28) than in the saline group at 3 h (2.23 +/- 0.93) and also significantly lower in the KGF group (3.02 +/- 0.78) compared with the saline group (6.23 +/- 1.19) at 8 h. In this study, KGF pretreatment after acid aspiration was associated with reduced neutrophil recruitment into the lung and a decrease in MIP-2alpha gradients between BAL fluid and plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据