4.0 Article

Dopamine receptor blockade in the rat medial prefrontal cortex reduces spontaneous and amphetamine-induced activity and does not affect prepulse inhibition

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 669-673

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200212000-00010

关键词

activity; amphetamine; cis-flupenthixol; dopamine; medial prefrontal cortex; prepulse inhibition; sensorimotor gating; schizophrenia; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functions and interactions of cortical and subcortical dopamine systems are of interest because alterations in these systems have been implicated in neuropsychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia. It has been proposed that prefrontal dopamine transmission may oppose dopamine transmission in subcortical sites, such as the nucleus accumbens. Accordingly, reduced prefrontal dopamine transmission would be expected to enhance or induce behavioral effects that have been associated with stimulation of accumbal dopamine receptors. In rats, spontaneous and amphetamine-induced activity is supported by dopamine receptor stimulation in the nucleus accumbens, while prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, which is used to measure sensorimotor gating and is disrupted in schizophrenia, is reduced by increased accumbal dopamine receptor stimulation. In the present experiments, we found that bilateral infusion of the dopamine D-1/D-2 receptor antagonist cis-flupenthixol dihydrochloride into the medial prefrontal cortex of Wistar rats (25 mug each side) reduced spontaneous activity and completely blocked induction of hyperactivity by systemic administration of D-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg), while not affecting PPI. These findings do not support an antagonism between prefrontal and accumbal dopamine in the control of behavior. Rather, our data demonstrate that prefrontal dopamine transmission may modulate some behavioral processes in a similar way to accumbal dopamine. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据