4.5 Article

Transport of fragile X mental retardation protein via granules in neurites of PC12 cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 23, 页码 8332-8341

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.23.8332-8341.2002

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [5R01 HD 38038, R01 HD038038, 5 P30 HD26024] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lack of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) causes fragile X syndrome, a common form of inherited mental retardation. FMRP is an RNA binding protein thought to be involved in translation efficiency and/or trafficking of certain mRNAs. Recently, a subset of mRNAs to which FMRP binds with high affinity has been identified. These FMRP-associated mRNAs contain an intramolecular G-quartet structure. In neurons, dendritic mRNAs are involved in local synthesis of proteins in response to synaptic activity, and this represents a mechanism for synaptic plasticity. To determine the role of FMRP in dendritic mRNA transport, we have generated a stably FMR1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-transfected PC12 cell line with an inducible expression system (Tet-On) for regulated expression of the FMRP-GFP fusion protein. After doxycycline induction, FMRP-GFP was localized in granules in the neurites of PC12 cells. By using time-lapse microscopy, the trafficking of FMR-P-GFP granules into the neurites of living PC12 cells was demonstrated. Motile FMRP-GFP granules displayed two types of movements: oscillatory (bidirectional) and unidirectional anterograde. The average velocity of the granules was 0.19 mum/s with a maximum speed of 0.71 mum/s. In addition, we showed that the movement of FMRP-GFP labeled granules into the neurites was microtubute dependent. Colocalization studies further showed that the FMRP-GFP labeled granules also contained RNA, ribosomal subunits, kinesin heavy chain, and FXR1P molecules. This report is the first example of trafficking of RNA-containing granules with FMRP as a core constituent in living PC12 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据