4.6 Article

Oxidative stress induces arachidonate release from human lung cells through the epithelial growth factor receptor pathway

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2002-0033OC

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress is thought to be a factor influencing many inflammatory responses, including arachidonic acid (AA) release. We have studied the effect of hydrogen peroxide on AA and prostaglandin E-2 release, cytosolic phospholipase (cPLA(2)) steady-state mRNA, cPLA(2) protein levels, cPLA(2) enzyme activity, and cPLA(2) phosphorylation in a human lung epithelial cell line: A549 cells. Hydrogen peroxide caused a dose-dependent increase of A23187-stimulated AA and prostaglandin E-2 release, with a maximum effect at 1 h. This effect is associated with a maximum specific cPLA(2) activity at 1 h, and with a significant increase in cPLA(2) Serine 505 phosphorylation. All these effects were abolished, in a dose-related manner, by the epithelial growth factor receptor kinase inhibitor, AG 1478. To further investigate the pathway leading to the increase cPLA(2) phosphorylation, we used cells transfected with a Ras dominant negative vector and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) and p38 kinase inhibitors. Cells transfected with the Ras dominant negative vector exhibited diminished hydrogen peroxide-induced AA release and cPLA(2) phosphorylation as compared with cells transfected with the Ras expression vector. Both MEK and p38 kinase inhibitors inhibited the hydrogen peroxide effect on AA release and specific cPLA(2) activity. Finally, cells stably transfected with an antisense cPLA(2) vector exhibited diminished A23187-stimulated AA release in response to hydrogen peroxide as compared with cells stably transfected with empty expression vector. Collectively, these data show that hydrogen peroxide increases cPLA(2) activity through its phosphorylation utilizing an epithelial growth factor/Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据