4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Altered response to oral glutamine challenge as prognostic factor for overt episodes in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 781-787

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00330-6

关键词

ammonia; psychometric test; ammonia partial pressure; amino acids; Helicobacter pylori

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: We assessed the usefulness of oral glutamine challenge (OGC) and minimal hepatic encephalopathy in evaluating risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients. Methods: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) was inferred using neuro-psychological tests. Venous ammonia concentrations were measured pre- and post-60 min (NH3-60m) of a 10 g oral glutamine load. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis indicated a pathological glutamine tolerance cut-off value of NH3-60m >128 mug/dl. Results: In healthy control subjects (n = 10) ammonia concentrations remained unchanged but increased significantly in cirrhotic patients (from 70.41 +/- 45.2 to 127.43 +/- 78.6; P < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, altered OGC was related to Child-Pugh (odds ratio, OR = 7.69; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.72-33.3; P < 0.01) and MHE (OR = 5.45; 95% CI = 1.17-25.4; P < 0.05). In the follow-up 11 patients (15%) developed overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE). In multivariate analysis OGC (OR = 14.5; 95% CI = 1.26-126.3) and MHE (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.02-21.9) were independently related with HE in the follow-up. Patients with MHE and altered OGC showed significantly higher risk of overt HE in the follow-up (60%) than patients without MHE and normal OGC (2.8%) (Log rank test = 21.60; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: A pathological OGC in patients with MHE appears to be a prognostic factor for the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy, whereas a normal OGC in patients without MHE could exclude risk of overt HE. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据