4.5 Article

Molecular phenotype of rat striatal neurons expressing the dopamine D5 receptor subtype

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 2049-2058

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02280.x

关键词

basal ganglia; cat; ChAT; D1/D2 receptor synergism; striatal LTP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dopamine is one of the principal neurotransmitters in the basal ganglia, where it plays a critical role in motor control and cognitive function through its interactions with the specific dopamine receptors D-1 to D-5 . Although the activities mediated by most dopamine receptor subtypes have already been determined, the role of the D-5 receptor subtype in the basal ganglia has still not been established. Furthermore, it is often difficult to distinguish between dopamine D-5 and D-1 receptors as they are stimulated by the same ligands, and they have a similar molecular structure and pharmacology. In an effort to understand the differences between these two receptor subtypes, we have studied the distribution of neurons containing D-5 receptors in the striatum, and their molecular phenotype. As a result, we show that the D-5 receptor subtype is present in two different populations of striatal neurons, projection neurons and interneurons. Overall, the abundance of this receptor subtype in the striatum is low, particularly in striatal projection neurons of both the direct and indirect projection pathways. In contrast, the expression of D-5 receptors in striatal interneurons (cholinergic, somatostatin- or parvalbumin-positive neurons) is high, while low to moderate expression was observed in calretinin-positive neurons. Our results demonstrate the presence of D-5 receptors in all the striatal cell populations so far described, although at different intensities in each. The fact that a large number of striatal neurons express the D-5 receptor subtype suggests that this receptor fulfils an important function in the process of integrating information in the striatum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据