4.6 Article

A Suzaku observation of the ULIRG IRAS19254-7245: discerning the AGN component

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 504, 期 1, 页码 53-59

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811516

关键词

galaxies: active; galaxies: individual: IRAS 19254-7245; galaxies: Seyfert; X-rays: galaxies

资金

  1. UK STFC research council
  2. ASI (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana) [I/088/06/0]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the NASA [NNG04GB78A]
  4. STFC [PP/D000955/1, ST/G002355/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/F000057/1, PP/D000955/1, ST/G002355/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss a long Suzaku observation of IRAS 19254-7245 (also known as the Superantennae), one of the brightest and well studied Ultra Luminous Infrared Galaxies in the local Universe. This long observation provided the first detection of IRAS 19254-7245 above 10 keV, and a measurement of a 15-30 keV flux of similar to 5 x 10(-12) erg cm(-2) s(-1). The detection above 10 keV has allowed us to determine, for the first time, the intrinsic luminosity of the AGN hosted in IRAS 19254-7245, which is strongly absorbed (N-H similar to 3 x 10(24) cm(-2)) and has an intrinsic luminosity (L(2 - 10 keV) similar to 3 x 10(44) erg s(-1)) in the QSO regime. The 2-10 keV spectrum of IRAS 19254-7245 is remarkably hard (Gamma similar to 1.2), and presents a strong iron line (EW similar to 0.7 keV), clearly suggesting that below 10 keV we observe only reprocessed radiation. Since the energy of the Fe K emission is found to be similar to 6.7 keV, consistent with He-like Fe, and its EW is too high to be explained by a starburst-dominated scenario, we suggest that the 2-10 keV emission of IRAS 19254-7245 is dominated by reflection/scattering from highly ionized matter. Within this latter scenario, we found that the photon index of the illuminating source is Gamma = 1.87(-0.28)(+0.11) in excellent agreement with the mean value found for radio quiet unobscured AGN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据