4.5 Article

Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability

期刊

SPINE
卷 27, 期 23, 页码 2720-2725

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00012

关键词

injured workers; low back pain; prediction of work disability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design. To establish outcome, 253 workers with subacute and chronic low back conditions were assessed with a comprehensive multimethod biopsychosocial protocol at baseline, 3 days after the initial examination and 3 months later. Objective. To validate empirically a biopsychosocial modelf for prediction of occupational low back disability. Summary of Background Data. Costs of low back occupational disability continue to spiral despite stabilization of low back injury rates. An empirically based model to predict occupational disability in workers with low back injuries is required. Methods. Workers with subacute low back injuries (4-6 weeks after injury, n = 192) and those with chronic back pain (6-12 months after injury, n = 61) were the study participants. The biopsychosocial protocol included five groups of variables: 1) sociodemographic, 2) medical, 3) psychosocial, 4) pain behavior, and 5) workplace-related factors. Predictive validity was investigated through a 3-month follow-up assessment, at which time the return to work outcome was determined. Stepwise logistic regression models were developed to predict work status. Results. The final integrated model consisted of variables from a wide biopsychosocial spectrum: vitality, health transition, feeling that job is threatened due to injury, expectations of recovery, guarding behavior perception of severity of disability, time to complete walk, and right leg typical sciatica. Conclusions. The winning variables identified in the integrated model are dominated by cognitions, which are accompanied by disability behaviors. A cognitive-behavioral model with an adaptation-oriented rather than a pathology-oriented focus is favored for early intervention with high-risk workers since cognitions are amenable to change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据