4.6 Review

Study of star-forming galaxies in SDSS up to redshift 0.4 I. Metallicity evolution

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 505, 期 2, 页码 529-539

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912214

关键词

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: starburst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The chemical composition of the gas in galaxies over cosmic time provides a very important tool for understanding galaxy evolution. Although there are many studies at high redshift, they are rather scarce at lower redshifts. However, low redshift studies can provide important clues about the evolution of galaxies, furnishing the required link between the local and high redshift universe. In this work, we focus on the metallicity of the gas of star-forming galaxies at low redshift, looking for signs of chemical evolution. Aims. We aim to analyze the metallicity contents star-forming galaxies of similar luminosities and masses at different redshifts. With this purpose, we present a study of the metallicity of relatively massive (log(M-star/M-circle dot) greater than or similar to 10.5) star forming galaxies from SDSS-DR5 (Sloan Digital Sky Survey-data release 5), using different redshift intervals from 0.04 to 0.4. Methods. We used data processed with the STARLIGHT spectral synthesis code, correcting the fluxes for dust extinction, estimating metallicities using the R-23 method, and segregating the samples with respect to the value of the [NII]lambda 6583/[OII]lambda 3727 line ratio in order to break the R-23 degeneracy selecting the upper branch. We analyze the luminosity and mass-metallicity relations, and the effect of the Sloan fiber diameter looking for possible biases. Results. By dividing our redshift samples in intervals of similar magnitude and comparing them, significant signs of metallicity evolution are found. Metallicity correlates inversely with redshift: from redshift 0 to 0.4 a decrement of similar to 0.1 dex in 12 + log(O/H) is found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据