4.6 Article

Damped and sub-damped Lyman-α absorbers in z > 4 QSOs

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 508, 期 1, 页码 133-U186

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811541

关键词

Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: formation; quasars: absorption lines; intergalactic medium; cosmology: observations

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0407448]
  2. Ajax Foundation
  3. Norris Foundation
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [909182] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of a survey of damped (DLA, log N(H I) > 20.3) and sub-damped Lyman-alpha systems (19.5 < log N(H I) < 20.3) at z > 2.55 along the lines-of-sight to 77 quasars with emission redshifts in the range 4 < z(em) < 6.3. Intermediate resolution (R similar to 4300) spectra were obtained with the Echellette Spectrograph and Imager (ESI) mounted on the Keck telescope. A total of 100 systems with log N(H I) > 19.5 were detected of which 40 systems are damped Lyman-alpha systems for an absorption length of Delta X = 378. About half of the lines of sight of this homogeneous survey have never been investigated for DLAs. We study the evolution with redshift of the cosmological density of the neutral gas and find, consistent with previous studies at similar resolution, that Omega(DLA,HI) decreases at z > 3.5. The overall cosmological evolution of Omega(HI) shows a peak around this redshift. The H I column density distribution for log N(H I) >= 20.3 is fitted, consistent with previous surveys, with a single power-law of index alpha similar to -1.8 +/- 0.25. This power-law overpredicts data at the high-end and a second, much steeper, power-law (or a gamma function) is needed. There is a flattening of the function at lower H i column densities with an index of alpha similar to -1.4 for the column density range log N(H I) = 19.5-21. The fraction of H I mass in sub-DLAs is of the order of 30%. The H I column density distribution does not evolve strongly from z similar to 2.5 to z similar to 4.5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据