4.6 Article

Physical structure and water line spectrum predictions of the intermediate mass protostar OMC2-FIR4

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 506, 期 3, 页码 1229-1241

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911651

关键词

ISM: abundances; ISM: molecules; stars: formation

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. Intermediate mass (IM) stars are an important component of our Galaxy, as they significantly contribute to the interstellar FUV field and, consequently, play an important role in the energy balance of the ISM. Despite their importance, very little is known about their formation process and only a few studies have been devoted to characterizing the first phases in the evolution of IM protostars. Here we consider in great detail the case of the brightest and closest known young IM protostar: FIR4 in the OMC2 component of the Orion molecular cloud complex. Methods. We analyzed the available continuum emission (maps and SED) through one-dimensional dust radiative transfer calculations. We ran large grids of models to find the envelope model that reproduces the data best. The derived dust density and temperature profiles were then used to compute the gas temperature profile, equating gas cooling and heating terms across the envelope. Finally, we computed the water line spectrum for various possible values of water abundance. Results. The luminosity of FIR4 has been reevaluated to 1000 L(circle dot), making FIR4 definitively an IM protostar. The envelope surrounding FIR4 has a relatively shallow density power-law index, similar to 0.6. The most surprising result is that the gas and dust are thermally decoupled in the interior of the envelope, where the dust ices sublimate at 100 K. This has important consequences in the interpretation of the line data. We provide the predictions for the water spectrum, and discuss in detail the lines that will be observed by the Herschel Space Observatory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据