4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Bacterial translocation in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing surgery

期刊

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 1665-1671

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-7256-z

关键词

Crohn's disease; bacterial translocation; mesenteric lymph node; systemic inflammatory response syndrome; postoperative infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Much evidence, derived from experimental studies, suggests that bacterial translocation indeed occurs, yet its clinical significance is still a matter of controversy in humans. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of bacterial translocation in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing laparotomy and to identify any association with postoperative septic complications or systemic inflammatory response syndrome. METHODS: Mesenteric lymph node and peripheral blood samples from 42 patients with Crohn's disease undergoing laparotomy were collected for bacteriologic assessments. RESULTS: Bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph node was identified in 20 patients (48 percent). The most common organism was Escherichia coli (27 percent). Blood cultures were positive in 2 of 20 patients in whom translocation to lymph node was identified. Bacterial translocation was associated with a greater than two-fold increase in the incidence of postoperative septic complications (35 vs. 14 percent), but this difference was not significant. In the analysis of the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, a significantly higher incidence continued until the third postoperative day in patients with vs. those without bacterial translocation. In a logistic regression analysis, bacterial translocation had a significant effect on the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, even though septic complications were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph node predisposed patients with Crohn's disease undergoing laparotomy to systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据