4.7 Article

Characterisation of humic materials of different origin: A multivariate approach for quantifying the latent properties of dissolved organic matter

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 1327-1337

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00335-1

关键词

dissolved organic matter; UV-VIS; liquid-state C-13-NMR spectroscopy (NMR); size exclusion chromatography; elemental analysis; principal component analysis; cluster analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inherent chemical properties of eight different dissolved organic matters (DOMs) originating from soil, surface and groundwater have been analysed. The samples consist of isolated fulvic acids (FA), humic acids (HA), and humic substances (HS), i.e. natural mixtures containing a humic and a fulvic fraction. The humic substances have been characterised by elemental analysis, size exclusion chromatography, E-2/E-3 and E-4/E-6 UV absorption ratios, and liquid-state C-13-NMR spectroscopy. The information contents of the different analytical methods have been investigated by pattern recognition, i.e. cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). A comparative study of the information contents of DOM descriptors derived from different analytical methods is presented. Through extraction of information content of the individual analytical methods the inherent properties of DOM are quantified. Pattern recognition revealed significant quantitative differences in the inherent properties of DOM of different origin and type. PCA based on the NMR descriptors showed highest explained variance. However, all models showed low robustness due to the limited number of samples. The supervised pattern recognition, i.e. PCA, indicates a classification of DOMs into groups of similar properties by an increase in the number of samples. Furthermore that the number of groups may be higher and more continuously distributed than the conventional classification into fulvic acids, humic acids or humic substances. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据