4.6 Article

Radial temperature profiles for a large sample of galaxy clusters observed with XMM-Newton

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 486, 期 2, 页码 359-U18

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809538

关键词

X-rays : galaxies : clusters; galaxies : clusters : general; cosmology : observations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We measure radial temperature profiles as far out as possible for a sample of approximate to 50 hot, intermediate redshift galaxy clusters, selected from the XMM-Newton archive, keeping systematic errors under control. Methods. Our work is characterized by two major improvements. First, we used background modeling, rather than background subtraction, and the Cash statistic rather than the chi(2). This method requires a careful characterization of all background components. Second, we assessed systematic effects in detail. We performed two groups of tests. Prior to the analysis, we made use of extensive simulations to quantify the impact of different spectral components on simulated spectra. After the analysis, we investigated how the measured temperature profile changes, when choosing different key parameters. Results. The mean temperature profile declines beyond 0.2 R(180). For the first time, we provide an assessment of the source and the magnitude of systematic uncertainties. When comparing our profile with those obtained from hydrodynamic simulations, we find the slopes beyond approximate to 0.2 R(180) to be similar. Our mean profile is similar but somewhat flatter with respect to those obtained by previous observational works, possibly as a consequence of a different level of characterizing systematic effects. Conclusions. This work allows us to not only constrain cluster temperature profiles in outer regions with confidence, but also, from a more general point of view, to explore the limits of the current X-ray experiments (in particular XMM-Newton) with respect to the analysis of low surface-brightness emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据