4.2 Article

Time: the neglected dimension in cladistic biogeography?

期刊

GEOBIOS
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 277-286

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00065-7

关键词

Historical biogeography; Component analysis; Dinosauria; Dispersal; Vicariance

资金

  1. NERC Studentship [GT04/99/ES/37]
  2. NERC Postdoctoral Fellowship [GT59906ES]
  3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The value of temporal data has been widely recognised in historical biogeography. Cladistic biogeographic methods, however, have not formally incorporated time. A theoretical perspective suggests that area and biotic relationships will change in a complex reticulate manner through time. This is because the disappearance of geographic barriers (and the concomitant mixing of biotas) is likely to occur as frequently as barrier formation and vicariance. A reticulate biogeographic history will consist of a chronological series of incongruent distribution patterns. Any attempt to depict such a reticulate history using a cladistic topology will inevitably lead to interpretational error and ambiguity. Temporal data, however, may allow incongruent spatial relationships to be teased apart, and may, therefore, play a vital role in rigorous analytical biogeography. A simple method for integrating time into cladistic biogeography is proposed and tested using a data-set on dinosaur phylogeny and distribution. The results indicate that large biogeographic data-sets can contain several genuine, but incongruent, sets of area relationships that combine to obscure each other. The new method (temporally partitioned component analysis) is an effective means of exploring a data-set for such signals, and allows time-specific area relationships to be detected. The proposal that temporal data should play an integral role in cladistic biogeographic analysis has major implications for area cladogram interpretation, and also enhances the value of fossil evidence. (C) 2002 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据