期刊
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 363-366出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00473-X
关键词
-
Four different methods for interpreting the results of checkerboard synergy testing were compared by applying each to a set of synergy study data. Statistically significant differences in synergy were detected among methods (% synergy ranged from 10 to 83%). As interpretations were found to vary widely based upon method, one should be aware of this in interpreting the relevant literature. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据