4.6 Article

High-excitation molecular gas in local luminous AGN hosts

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 491, 期 2, 页码 483-487

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810513

关键词

ISM: molecules; radio lines: ISM; galaxies: active; galaxies: quasars: individual: I Zw 1; galaxies: quasars: individual: Mrk 1048; galaxies: individual: 3C 293

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. The discovery of large amounts of molecular gas in the hosts of luminous AGN in the local Universe offers a unique opportunity to study its physical conditions under the influence of starbursts and powerful AGN in great detail with present and future mm/sub-mm telescopes. Towards achieving this goal we present first results of multi-J CO line observations of such objects. Methods. We made use of the mm/sub-mm receivers on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) to conduct observations of the CO J = 3-2, 2-1 lines in five local, optically powerful AGN and of the higher excitation CO J = 4-3 line in 3C 293 (a powerful radio galaxy). Results. Luminous CO J = 3-2 emission and high CO (3-2)/(1-0) intensity ratios are found in all objects, indicating highly excited molecular gas. In 3C 293, an exceptionally bright CO J = 4-3 line with a high CO(4-3)/(1-0) ratio cannot be easily explained given its quiescent star-forming environment and very low AGN X-ray luminosity. Conclusions. In 3C 293, shocks emanating from a well-known interaction of a powerful jet with a dense ISM may be responsible for the high excitation of its molecular gas on galaxy-wide scales. Star formation can readily account for the gas excitation in the rest of the objects, although high X-ray AGN luminosities can also contribute significantly in two cases. Measuring and eventually imaging CO (high-J)/(low-J) line ratios in local luminous QSO hosts can be done by a partially completed ALMA during its early phases of commissioning, promising a sensitive probe of starburst versus AGN activity in obscured environments at high linear resolutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据