4.6 Article

Can giant planets form by gravitational fragmentation of discs?: Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of the inner disc region (≲40 AU)

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 480, 期 3, 页码 879-887

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078628

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; hydrodynamics; instabilities; radiative transfer; planets and satellites : formation; stars : planetary systems : protoplanetary discs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Gravitational fragmentation has been proposed as a mechanism for the formation of giant planets in close orbits around solar-type stars. However, it is debatable whether this mechanism can function in the inner regions (R less than or similar to 40 AU) of real discs. Aims. We investigate the thermodynamics of the inner regions of discs and their propensity to fragment. Methods. We use a newly developed method for treating the energy equation and the equation of state, which accounts for radiative transfer effects in SPH simulations of circumstellar discs. The different chemical and internal states of hydrogen and the properties of dust at different densities and temperatures (ice coated dust grains at low temperatures, ice melting, dust sublimation) are all taken into account by the new method. Results. We present radiative hydrodynamic simulations of the inner regions of massive circumstellar discs and examine two cases: (i) a disc irradiated by a cool background radiation field (T-BGR similar to 10 K) and (ii) a disc heated by radiation from its central star (T-BGR similar to 1200 K[R/AU](-1)). In neither case does the disc fragment: in the former because it cannot cool fast enough and in the latter because it is not gravitationally unstable. Our results (a) corroborate previous numerical results using different treatments for the hydrodynamics and the radiative transfer, and (b) confirm our own earlier analytic predictions. Conclusions. Disc fragmentation is unlikely to be able to produce giant planets around solar-type stars at radii less than or similar to 40 AU.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据