4.6 Article

Attitudes and use of complementary medicine in men with prostate cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 168, 期 6, 页码 2505-2509

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64178-X

关键词

prostate; neoplasms; complementary therapies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Patients with cancer are increasingly incorporating complementary therapies into the overall treatment. We determine the prevalence and patterns of use of complementary therapies among patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients attending 6 urology institutions for prostate cancer management completed a self-administered questionnaire on complementary therapy. All men diagnosed with prostate cancer were eligible, regardless of age, stage of disease or treatment. Results: A total of 1,099 patients returned the questionnaire. The overall response rate was 78.5%. Complementary therapies had previously been or were currently being used by 23.5% (258) and 18.2% (200) of patients, respectively. Higher levels of education and income were associated with greater use of complementary therapy (p <0.002 by logistic regression). Patients with progressive disease or those primarily treated with hormones were most likely to use complementary therapy. Among the patients using complementary therapy 90% believed that it would help them live longer and improve quality of life, 60% believed it would relieve symptoms and 47% expected it to cure disease. Conclusions: Complementary therapies are used by a large number of patients with prostate cancer, particularly those with progressive disease or who have undergone multiple treatments. Health care providers need to recognize this growing pattern of use of complementary therapy. Among patients who use complementary therapy the perception of benefit is much greater than that supported by scientific data. Future research should aim to unravel the complex psychosocial dynamics that influence the decision to use complementary therapy by men with prostate cancer and to educate patients about the efficacy of such therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据