4.6 Article

Two extremely luminous WN stars in the Galactic center with circumstellar emission from dust and gas

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 486, 期 3, 页码 971-984

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809568

关键词

stars : wolf-rayet; HII regions; Galaxy : center; stars : individual : WR102ka; stars : individual : WR102c

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The central region of our Galaxy contains a large population of young massive stars. These stars are concentrated in three large star clusters, as well as being scattered in the field. Strong ionizing radiation and stellar winds of massive stars are the essential feedback agents that determine the physics of the ISM in the Galactic center. Aims. The aim is to study relatively isolated massive WN-type stars in the Galactic center in order to explore their properties and their influence on the ISM. Methods. The K-band spectra of two WN stars in the Galactic center, WR102ka and WR102c, are exploited to infer the stellar parameters and to compute synthetic stellar spectra using the Potsdam Wolf-Rayet (PoWR) model atmosphere code. These models are combined with dust-shell models for analyzing the Spitzer IRS spectra of these objects. Archival IR images complement the interpretation. Results. We report that WR102ka and WR102c are among the most luminous stars in the Milky Way. They critically influence their immediate environment by strong mass loss and intense UV radiation, and thus set the physical conditions for their compact circumstellar nebula. The mid-IR continua for both objects are dominated by dust emission. For the first time we report the presence of dust in the close vicinity of WN stars. Also for the first time, we have detected lines of pure-rotational transitions of molecular hydrogen in a massive-star nebula. A peony-shaped nebula around WR102ka is resolved at 24 mu m by the Spitzer MIPS camera. We attribute the formation of this IR-bright nebula to the recent evolutionary history of WR102ka.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据