4.6 Article

Rapid trafficking of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase to the cell surface regulates progelatinase A activation

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 82, 期 12, 页码 1673-1684

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.LAB.0000041713.74852.2A

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pericellular matrix degradation during cancer invasion and inflammation is dependent on activation of progelatinase A by membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP); a stoichiometric concentration of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) is required. Activation of progelatinase A has generally been considered to be a slow process occurring as a result of enhanced expression of MT1-MMP. We herein report that ConA treatment of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells is followed by MT1-MMP-induced activation of progelatinase A on the cell surface within 1 hour. Cell surface biotinylation, immunohistochemistry, and I-125-labeled TIMP-2 binding to cell surface MT1-MMP were used to characterize the appearance and function of MT1-MMP on the plasma membrane. Treatment of HT1080 cells with ConA resulted in increased specific binding of I-125-labeled TIMP-2 to cell surface receptors within 5 minutes. TIMP-2 binds almost exclusively to activated MT1-MMP on the surface of HT1080 cells. MT1-MMP function at the cell surface was also accelerated by treatment of cells with cytochalasin D, an inhibitor of actin filaments, PMA, a stimulator of protein kinase C, and bafilomycin A(1), an inhibitor of lysosome/endosome function. A functional pool of intracellular MT1-MMP available for trafficking to the cell surface was demonstrated by repetitive ConA stimulation. ConA-induced expression of MT1-MMP mRNA (Northern blot analysis) in HT1080 cells was a delayed event (>6 hours). These data suggest that presynthesized MT1-MMP is sorted to a transient storage compartment (trans-Golgi network/endosomes), where it is available for rapid trafficking to the plasma membrane and cell surface proteolytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据