4.6 Article

HI content and other structural properties of galaxies in the Virgo cluster from the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 482, 期 1, 页码 43-52

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809382

关键词

galaxies : clusters : individual : Virgo; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : ISM; galaxies : fundamental parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the results of an HI blind survey of 80 deg(2) of the Virgo cluster, based on the 08 degrees <= delta <= 16 degrees strip of ALFALFA, the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey. 187 HI sources of high significance are found providing a complete census of HI sources in this region of the Virgo cluster (- 1000 < cz < 3000 km s(-1)) with M-HI >= 10(7.5 similar to 8) M-circle dot. 156/187 (83%) sources are identified with optical galaxies from the Virgo Cluster Catalogue (Binggeli et al. 1985, AJ, 90, 1681), all but 8 with late-type galaxies. Ten sources are not associated with optical galaxies and were found to correspond to tidally-disrupted systems (see Kent et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, L15; and Haynes et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, L19). The remaining 21 (11%) are associated with galaxies that are not listed in the Virgo Cluster Catalogue. For all sources with an optical counterpart in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we analyzed i-band SDSS plates to measure optical structural parameters. We find that in the Virgo cluster: i) HI inhabits galaxies that are structurally similar to ordinary late-type galaxies; ii) their HI content can be predicted from their optical luminosity; iii) low surface brightness galaxies have low optical luminosity and contain small quantities of neutral hydrogen; iv) low surface brightness, massive Malin1 type galaxies are comfortably rare objects (less than 0.5%); v) there are no dark-galaxies with HI masses M-HI >= 10(7.5 similar to 8) M-circle dot; vi) less than 1% of early-type galaxies contain neutral hydrogen with MHI >= 10(7.5 similar to 8) M-circle dot (di Serego Alighieri et al. 2007, A&A, 474, 851).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据