3.8 Article

Pharmacological treatment of chronic diabetes by stimulating pancreatic β-cell regeneration with systemic co-administration of EGF and gastrin

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 414-420

出版社

BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2002.910621.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transgenic expression of gastrin and EGF receptor ligands Stimulates islet neogenesis in adult mice, significantly increasing islet mass. The present study aimed to determine whether pharmacological treatment with gastrin and EGF can significantly stimulate beta-cell regeneration in chronic, severe insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes was induced by intravenous streptozotocin, resulting in >95% beta cell destruction, Four weeks litter, blood glucose levels were restored to normal range by exogenous insulin therapy and rats were treated with EGF/gastrin in combination, gastrin alone, or EGF alone given subcutaneously. After 14 days treatment blood glucose was significantly lower in the EGF/gastrin group compared to the untreated diabetic controls. Along with improved glucose tolerance, EGF/gastrin treatment significantly increased plasma C peptide and pancreatic insulin content compared to diabetic controls. Histological analysis showed that EGF/gastrin treatment significantly increased beta-cell mass as determined by point counting morphometrics, The EGF/ gastrin group had a significantly greater number of BrdU labelled beta-cells/section consistent with stimulation of beta-cell replication or neogenesis. An increased number of gastrin receptor positive cells were observed in the EGF/gastrin-treated groups. In contrast to the effectiveness of the EGF/gastrin combination, neither gastrin nor EGF alone improved glucose tolerance in severely streptozotocin-diabetic rats. These studies indicate that physiologically significant improvement in glucose tolerance can be achieved through stimulating beta-cell regeneration with gastrin/EGF administered systemically as conventional pharmacological therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据