4.6 Article

High precision radial velocity measurements in the infrared A first assessment of the RV stability of CRIRES

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 491, 期 3, 页码 929-939

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810174

关键词

instrumentation: spectrographs; instrumentation: adaptive optics; methods: observational; techniques: radial velocities; techniques: spectroscopic; stars: AGB and post-AGB

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG RE 1664/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High precision radial velocity (RV) measurements in the near infrared are in high demand, especially in the context of exoplanet search campaigns shifting their interest to late type stars in order to detect planets with ever lower mass or targeting embedded pre-main-sequence objects. ESO commissioned a new spectrograph at the VLT - CRIRES - designed for high resolution near-infrared spectroscopy with a comparably broad wavelength coverage and the possibility of using gascells to provide a stable RV zero-point. Here, we investigate the intrinsic short-term RV stability of CRIRES, both with gascell calibration data and on-sky measurements using the absorption lines of the Earth's atmosphere imprinted in the source spectrum as a local RV rest frame. Moreover, we also investigate for the first time the intrinsic stability of telluric lines at 4100 nm for features originating in the lower troposphere. Our analysis of nearly 5 h of consecutive observations of MS Vel, a M2II bright giant centred on two SiO first overtone band-heads at 4100 nm, demonstrates that the intrinsic short- term stability of CRIRES is very high, showing only a slow and fully compensateable drift of up to 60m/s after 4.5 h. The radial velocity of the telluric lines is constant down to a level of approx. +/- 10 m/s (or 7/1000 of one pixel). Utilising the same telluric lines as a rest frame for our radial velocity measurements of the science target, we obtain a constant RV with a precision of approx. +/- 20m/s for MS Vel, as expected for a M-giant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据