4.8 Article

Erythropoietin is a novel vascular protectant through activation of Akt1 and mitochondrial modulation of cysteine proteases

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 106, 期 23, 页码 2973-2979

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000039103.58920.1F

关键词

apoptosis; cytochrome c; cysteine endopeptidases; proteins, mitochondrial; proteins, proto-oncogene

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES06639] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Erythropoietin (EPO) is a critical regulator for the proliferation of immature erythroid precursors, but its role as a potential cytoprotectant in the cerebrovasculature system has not been defined. Methods and Results-We examined the ability of EPO to regulate a cascade of apoptotic death-related cellular pathways during anoxia-induced vascular injury in endothelial cells (ECs). EC injury was evaluated by trypan blue, DNA fragmentation, membrane phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, protein kinase B activity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and cysteine protease induction. Exposure to anoxia alone rapidly increased genomic DNA fragmentation from 2 +/- 1% to 40 +/- 5% and membrane PS exposure from 3 +/- 2% to 56 +/- 5% over 24 hours. Administration of a cytoprotective concentration of EPO (10 ng/mL) prevented DNA destruction and PS exposure. Cytoprotection by EPO was completely abolished by cotreatment with anti-EPO neutralizing antibody, which suggests that EPO was necessary and sufficient for the prevention of apoptosis. Protection by EPO was intimately dependent on the activation of protein kinase B (Akt1) and the maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential. Subsequently, EPO inhibited caspase 8-, caspase 1-, and caspase 3-like activities that were linked to mitochondrial cytochrome c release. Conclusions-The present work serves to illustrate that EPO can offer novel cytoprotection during ischemic vascular injury through direct modulation of Akt1 phosphorylation, mitochondrial membrane potential, and cysteine protease activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据