4.6 Article

Abundances of four open clusters from solar stars

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 489, 期 1, 页码 403-U148

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809969

关键词

stars : abundances; Galaxy : open clusters and associations : individual : NGC 3680; Galaxy : open clusters ans associations : individual : IC4651; Galaxy : open clusters and associations : individual : Praesepe; Galaxy : open clusters and associations : individual : M67

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Portuguese FCT [PTDC/CTE-AST/65971/2006]
  4. Indian DST
  5. WEBDA database

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We present the abundance measurements of several elements ( Fe, Ca, Na, Ni, Ti, Al, Cr, Si) for 20 solar-type stars belonging to four Galactic open clusters: NGC 3680, IC 4651, Praesepe, and M 67. Oxygen abundances were in addition measured for most stars in each cluster apart from IC 4651. For NGC 3680, accurate abundance determinations using high-resolution spectra covering a large spectral domain are computed for the first time. Methods. We used UVES high-resolution, high signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio spectra and performed a differential analysis with respect to the sun, by measuring equivalent widths and assuming LTE. Results. The most surprising result is a measurement of significant supersolar metallicity for Praesepe ([Fe/H] = 0.27 +/- 0.10). As for the other clusters, we confirm a supersolar metallicity for IC 4651 ([Fe/H] = 0.12 +/- 0.05), a solar metallicity for M 67 ([Fe/H] = 0.03 +/- 0.04) and a slight subsolar metallicity for NGC 3680 ([Fe/H] = -0.04 +/- 0.03). We find that the abundance ratios of almost all elements are solar, with the notable exception of oxygen in NGC 3680 and Praesepe, supersolar in the former cluster ([O/Fe] = 0.2 +/- 0.05) and as low as [O/Fe] = -0.4 +/- 0.1 in the latter. Observations of several objects per cluster is required to obtain robust results, especially for those elements with a limited number of suitable lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据