4.8 Article

Development of an in vitro drug release assay that accurately predicts in vivo drug retention for liposome-based delivery systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 161-170

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00294-8

关键词

liposomes; drug retention; drug release assay; large unilamellar vesicles (LUV); multilamellar vesicles (MLV)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The therapeutic activity of numerous drugs can be dramatically improved by liposomal encapsulation. However, this requires that liposomes retain their encapsulated drugs following systemic administration. Often, in vitro drug release assays do not accurately predict the liposomal drug retention properties observed in vivo. We postulate that this discrepancy is due to the large membrane pool present in blood cells and tissues, into which drugs can distribute after in vivo administration. Herein we describe an in vitro drug release assay that more accurately predicts in vivo drug release from liposomes following systemic administration. Drug-encapsulated large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) similar to100 nm in diameter were incubated with a 100-fold excess of multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) containing 300 mM sucrose, which served as 'acceptors' for drug release and transfer from 'donor' LUVs. Following incubation at 37 degreesC, the donor and acceptor populations were separated with greater than 90% efficiency by centrifugation at 1600 x g for 10 min. The amount of drug in the MLV pellet reflects the degree of drug leakage from the donor liposomes. Drug release profiles using this in vitro assay were compared to those obtained using dialysis-based assays and in vivo results following systemic administration to mice. Our results indicate that this release assay is a better predictor of in vivo drug transfer than dialysis-based systems. We also demonstrate its utility in measuring exchange of lipophilic components. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据