4.6 Article

Defining the importance of phosphatidylserine synthase 2 in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 49, 页码 47701-47708

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M207734200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL66621, HL66600, HL66590] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphatidylserine synthase 1 (Pss1) and phosphatidylserine synthase 2 (Pss2) produce phosphatidylserine by exchanging serine for the head groups of other phospholipids. Pss1 and Pss2 are structurally similar (similar to32% amino acid identity) but differ in their substrate specificities, with Pss1 using phosphatidylcholine for the serine exchange reaction and Pss2 using phosphatidylethanolamine. Whether Pss1 and Pss2 are both required for mammalian growth and development is not known, and no data exist on the relative contributions of the two enzymes to serine exchange activities in different tissues. To address those issues and also to define the cell type-specific expression of Pss2, we generated Pss2-deficient mice in which a beta-galactosidase marker is expressed from Pss2 regulatory sequences. Histologic studies of Pss2-deficient mice revealed very high levels of beta-galactosidase expression in Sertoli cells of the testis and high levels of expression in brown fat, neurons, and myometrium. The ability of testis extracts from Pss2-deficient mice to catalyze serine exchange was reduced by more than 95%; reductions of similar to90% were noted in the brain and liver. However, we found no perturbations in the phospholipid content of any of these tissues. As judged by Northern blots, the expression of Pss1 was not upregulated in Pss2-deficient cells and tissues. Testis weight was reduced in Pss2-deficient mice, and some of the male mice were infertile. We conclude that Pss2 is responsible for the majority of serine exchange activity in in vitro assays, but a deficiency in this enzyme does not cause perturbations in phospholipid content or severe developmental abnormalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据