4.7 Article

Dynamics of OH formation in the dissociation of acrylic acid in its (n,π*) and (π,π*) transitions excited at 248 and 193 nm

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 117, 期 22, 页码 10097-10103

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1520534

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The (n,pi(*)) and (pi,pi(*)) transitions in acrylic acid (H2C=CHCOOH) are excited by KrF (248 nm) and ArF (193 nm) laser pulses, respectively, and the dynamics of its photodissociation to give OH fragments is studied using laser induced fluorescence technique. At both the photolysis wavelengths, the OH fragments produced are vibrationally cold, but have different rotational state distributions. To get an insight into the potential energy surface involved in the dissociation process, spin-orbit and Lambda-doublets ratios are also measured. Average relative translational energy partitioned into the photofragments is determined using linewidth of the Doppler profiles to be 13.2+/-3.1 and 10.2+/-2.8 kcal/mol at 193 and 248 nm excitations, respectively. High percentage of translational energy released into the photofragments suggests the presence of an exit barrier for the dissociation. On 248 nm excitation, the OH radicals are formed instantaneously during the laser pulse, while on 193 nm excitation, a risetime of similar to2 mus is seen. Another difference between the photodissociation at 193 nm and 248 nm is the observation of an intense fluorescence in UV-visible region at the former, and no fluorescence at the later wavelength. Our experimental results are compared with those obtained by recent ab initio calculations by Fang and Liu. It is concluded that when (pi,pi(*)) transition of acrylic acid is excited at 193 nm, the initially prepared S-2 state undergoes nonradiative transitions to S-1 and T-2 states, and from where the molecule subsequently dissociates, while excitation to (n,pi(*)) transition at 248 nm leads to dissociation solely from the initially prepared S-1 state. (C) 2002 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据