4.7 Article

HER2 overexpression in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder:: Prognostic implications

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 514-518

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10731

关键词

bladder carcinoma; c-erbB-2; HER2; HercepTest; prognosis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HER2 (c-erbB-2) receptor is overexpressed in a variety of human malignant tumors and, in breast carcinoma, has been identified as a target for anti-HER2-directed therapy with the monoclonal antibody (MAb) trastuzumab. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate immunohistochemic HER2 expression in a large cohort of muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder and to compare the results to pathologic characteristics and survival. Paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 138 patients undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma were studied immunohistochemically with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved HercepTest (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). HER2 overexpression was observed in 57 of 138 tumors (41%) and occurred more frequently in high-grade carcinomas than in low-grade carcinomas (p = 0.036). No significant relationship with HER2 overexpression was registered for tumor staging and lymph node status. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly worse disease-related survival (p = 0.034) in patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors compared to those without HER2 overexpression. In addition to lymph node status (P = 0.0001; relative risk [RR] = 2.93), HER2 status (p = 0.020; RR = 2.22) was identified as an independent predictor for disease-related survival in a multivariate analysis. These results suggest that HER2 expression might provide additional prognostic information in patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinomas. Because many of these patients harbor HER2-overexpressing tumors, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of trastuzumab in bladder carcinoma are warranted. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据