4.5 Article

Mars' upper atmosphere and ionosphere at low, medium, and high solar activities: Implications for evolution of water

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JE001809

关键词

Mars; thermosphere; ionosphere; ion composition; evolution of water

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] Self-consistent models for 11 neutral and 18 ion species from 80 to 300 km on Mars have been developed by solving the continuity equations including ambipolar diffusion for ions. The models were calculated for the conditions of the HST, FUSE, and Mariner 6 and 7 observations of D, H-2, and H, respectively, when the solar activity index was equal to 25, 61, and 88 at Mars orbit, respectively. Special care was taken to simulate the processes of H-2 and HD dissociation in the reactions with CO2+,O+,CO+,N-2(+), N+,Ar+, and O(D-1) and by photoelectrons. Thermal and nonthermal escape velocities were used as the upper boundary conditions for H-2, H, HD, D, and He. The H-2 and HD mixing ratios of 15 ppm and 11 ppb chosen to fit the FUSE and HST observations of H-2 and D, respectively, result in (HD/H-2)/(HDO/H2O) = 0.4. This value agrees with the depletion of D in H-2 because of the smaller HDO photolysis cross section and the preferential condensation of HDO above the condensation level. Therefore the controversial problem of deuterium fractionation is solved throughout the atmosphere. The influx of cometary water was approximate to0.5 m planetwide in the last 3.8 billion years. It cannot affect the estimates of more than 30 m of water lost by sputtering and nonthermal and thermal escape and more than 1.3 km of water lost in the reaction with iron with subsequent hydrodynamic escape of H-2. The calculated ion density profiles at various solar activity and the column reaction rates provide complete quantitative information for behavior of each ion, its formation, and its loss. The HCO+ ion is abundant in Mars' ionosphere because it is a final product of many reactions of other ions with H-2 and does not react with neutral species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据