4.0 Article

Results from HOPS: A multiwavelength census of Orion protostars

期刊

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
卷 334, 期 1-2, 页码 53-56

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201211761

关键词

circumstellar matter; infrared: ISM; infrared: stars; stars: formation

资金

  1. NASA through Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-GO-11548.01-A]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surveys with the Spitzer and Herschel space observatories are now enabling the discovery and characterization of large samples of protostars in nearby molecular clouds, providing the observational basis for a detailed understanding of star formation in diverse environments. We are pursuing this goal with the Herschel Orion Protostar Survey (HOPS), which targets 328 Spitzer-identified protostars in the Orion molecular clouds, the largest star-forming region in the nearest 500 pc. The sample encompasses all phases of protostellar evolution and a wide range of formation environments, from dense clusters to relative isolation. With a grid of radiative transfer models, we fit the 1-870 mu m spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the protostars to estimate their envelope densities, cavity opening angles, inclinations, and total luminosities. After correcting the bolometric luminosities and temperatures of the sources for foreground extinction and inclination, we find a spread of several orders of magnitude in luminosity at all evolutionary states, a constant median luminosity over the more evolved stages, and a possible deficit of high-inclination, rapidly infalling envelopes among the Spitzer-identified sample. We have detected over 100 new sources in the Herschel images; some of them may fill this deficit. We also report results from modeling the pre- and post-outburst 1-870 mu m SEDs of V2775 Ori (HOPS 223), a known FU Orionis outburster in the sample. It is the least luminous FU Ori star with a protostellar envelope. (C) 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据