4.7 Article

Cell-specific regulatory modules control expression of genes in vascular and visceral smooth muscle tissues

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 91, 期 12, 页码 1151-1159

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000047508.30800.4F

关键词

SM22 alpha; telokin; gene regulation

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-58571] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-61130] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel approach with chimeric SM22alpha/telokin promoters was used to identify gene regulatory modules that are required for regulating the expression of genes in distinct smooth muscle tissues. Conventional deletion or mutation analysis of promoters does not readily distinguish regulatory elements that are required for basal gene expression from those required for expression in specific smooth muscle tissues. In the present study, the mouse telokin gene was isolated, and a 370-bp (-190 to 180) minimal promoter was identified that directs visceral smooth muscle-specific expression in vivo in transgenic mice. The visceral smooth muscle-specific expression of the telokin promoter transgene is in marked contrast to the reported arterial smooth muscle-specific expression of a 536-bp minimal SM22alpha (-475 to 61) promoter transgene. To begin to identify regulatory elements that are responsible for the distinct tissue-specific expression of these promoters, a chimeric promoter in which a 172-bp SM22alpha gene fragment (-288 to -116) was fused to the minimal telokin promoter was generated and characterized. The -288 to -116 SM22alpha gene fragment significantly increased telokin promoter activity in vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, a fragment of the telokin promoter (-94 to -49) increased the activity of the SM22alpha promoter in visceral smooth muscle cells of the bladder. Together, these data demonstrate that both vascular- and visceral smooth muscle-specific regulatory modules direct gene expression in subsets of smooth muscle tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据