4.6 Article

Reduction of atherosclerosis by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist fenofibrate in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 50, 页码 48051-48057

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M206966200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several clinical and angiographic intervention trials have shown that fibrate treatment leads to a reduction of the coronary events associated to atherosclerosis. Fibrates are ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor a (PPARalpha) that modulate risk factors related to atherosclerosis by acting at both systemic and vascular levels. Here, we investigated the effect of treatment with the PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate (FF) on the development of atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein (apo) E-deficient mice and human apoA-I transgenic apoE-deficient (hapoA-I Tg x apoE-deficient) mice fed a Western diet. In apoE-deficient mice, plasma lipid levels were increased by FF treatment with no alteration in the cholesterol distribution profile. FF treatment did not reduce atherosclerotic lesion surface area in the aortic sinus of 5-month-old apoE-deficient mice. By contrast, FF treatment decreased total cholesterol and esterified cholesterol contents in descending aortas of these mice, an effect that was more pronounced in older mice exhibiting more advanced lesions. Furthermore, FF treatment reduced MCP-1 mRNA levels in the descending aortas of apoE-deficient mice, whereas ABCA-1 expression levels were maintained despite a significant reduction of aortic cholesterol content. In apoE-deficient mice expressing a human apoA-I transgene, FF increased human apoA-I plasma and hepatic mRNA levels without affecting plasma lipid levels. This increase in human apoA-I expression was accompanied by a significant reduction in the lesion surface area in the aortic sinus. These data indicate that the PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate reduces atherosclerosis in these animal models of atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据