4.6 Article

An aspirin-triggered lipoxin A4 stable analog displays a unique topical anti-inflammatory profile

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 169, 期 12, 页码 7063-7070

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.12.7063

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipoxins and 15-epi-lipoxins are counter-regulatory lipid mediators that modulate leukocyte trafficking and promote the resolution of inflammation. To assess the potential of lipoxins as novel anti-inflammatory agents, a stable 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) analog, 15-epi-16-p-fluorophenoxy-lipoxin A(4) methyl ester (ATLa), was synthesized by total organic synthesis and examined for efficacy relative to a potent leukotriene B-4 (LTB4) receptor antagonist (LTB4R-Ant) and the clinically used topical glucocorticoid methylprednisolone aceponate. In vitro, ATLa was 100-fold more potent than LTB4R-Ant for inhibiting neutrophil chemotaxis and trans-epithelial cell migration induced by fMLP, but was similar to10-fold less potent than the LTB4R-Ant in blocking responses to LTB4. A broad panel of cutaneous inflammation models that display pathological aspects of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis was used to directly compare the topical efficacy of ATLa with that of LTB4R-Ant and methylprednisolone aceponate. ATLa was efficacious in all models tested: LTB4/Iloprost-, calcium ionophore-, croton oil-, and mezerein-induced inflammation and trimellitic anhydride-induced allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity. ATLa was efficacious in mouse and guinea pig skin inflammation models, exhibiting dose-dependent effects on edema, neutrophil or eosinophil infiltration, and epidermal hyperproliferation. We conclude that the LXA, and aspirin-triggered LXA(4) pathways play key anti-inflammatory roles in vivo. Moreover, these results suggest that ATLa and related LXA(4) analogs may have broad therapeutic potential in inflammatory disorders and could provide an alternative to corticosteroids in certain clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据