4.5 Article

PEGylation of microspheres generates a heterogeneous population of particles with differential surface characteristics and biological performance

期刊

FEBS LETTERS
卷 532, 期 3, 页码 338-344

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03710-9

关键词

complement activation; surface camouflaging; long-circulating particle; macrophage; microsphere; poly(ethylene glycol)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface PEGylation of polystyrene microspheres with methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-5000 (mPEG-5000) generated a heterogeneous population of entities that differed in surface characteristics and in vitro biological performance (phagocytosis and complement activation). Surface heterogeneity was determined by hydrophobic interaction chromatography, measurements of particle electrophoretic mobility in a defined field and adlayer thickness of the projected mPEG chains. The particle population separation by hydrophobic interaction chromatography demonstrated a remarkable linear relationship between the particle zeta potential and phagocytosis by J774 A1 macrophage-like cells. Microsphere populations bearing a predominant surface of mPEG molecules as high-density mushroom-brush intermediate and/or brush configuration were most resistant to phagocytosis and activated the human complement system poorly. Conversely, those populations with predominant surface mPEGs in a mushroom regime were potent activators of the complement system and were prone to phagocytosis. Therefore, surface heterogeneity explains why a fraction of intravenously injected 'long-circulating' nanoparticles is cleared rapidly by macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography can readily assess the extent of surface heterogeneity of PEGylated particulate drug delivery systems and pre-select particles with optimal retention times in the blood. These observations may also be relevant with respect to successful surface camouflaging of cells, drug depots and implantable devices. (C) 2002 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据