4.7 Article

Risk of hip and renal fracture among dialysis transplant recipients

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 288, 期 23, 页码 3014-3018

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.23.3014

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Renal failure places people at particularly high risk of hip fracture. However, the possible differential impact of dialysis and renal transplantation on this risk is not well understood. Objective To determine if patients who receive kidney transplants are at greater risk of hip fracture compared with those who continue to undergo dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants Cohort study of 101039 patients with end-stage renal disease placed on the renal transplant waiting list in the United States between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1999. Main Outcome Measures I Hip fractures, identified from Medicare claims data. Results Among the patients included in this analysis, 971 hip fractures were observed during the follow-up period of 314767 person-years. The incidence rate of hip fracture in patients receiving dialysis was 2.9 per 1000 patients per year compared with 3.3 hip fractures per 1000 patients per year in those who had previously received a renal transplant. Initially, the relative risk (RR) of hip fracture associated with transplantation was 1.34-fold greater when compared with dialysis (adjusted RR, 1.34; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.61) but then decreased by 1 % per month (adjusted RR, 0.99; 95% Cl, 0.98-0.99) until the estimated risk became equal for dialysis and transplant recipients approximately 630 days after transplantation (adjusted RR, 1.00; 95 % Cl, 0.87-1-15). Among transplant recipients, risk of fracture was relatively higher in persons with a prolonged period of dialysis before transplantation. Conclusion The high risk of hi p fracture among dialysis patients is exceeded by that among renal, transplant patients during the first 1 to 3 years after transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据