4.7 Article

The origin of angular momentum in dark matter halos

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 581, 期 2, 页码 799-809

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/344361

关键词

cosmology : theory; dark matter; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new explanation for the origin of angular momentum in galaxies and their dark halos, in which the halos obtain their spin through the cumulative acquisition of angular momentum from satellite accretion. In our model, the buildup of angular momentum is a random walk process associated with the mass assembly history of the halo's major progenitor. We assume no correlation between the angular momenta of accreted objects. The main role of tidal torques in this approach is to produce the random tangential velocities of merging satellites. Using the extended Press-Schechter approximation, we calculate the growth of mass, angular momentum, and spin parameter lambda for many halos. Our random walk model reproduces the key features of the angular momentum of halos found in LambdaCDM N-body simulations: a lognormal distribution in lambda with an average of [lambda] approximate to 0.045 and dispersion sigmalambda = 0.56, independent of mass and redshift. The evolution of the spin parameter in individual halos in this model is quite different from the steady increase with time of angular momentum in the tidal torque picture. We find both in N-body simulations and in our random walk model that the value of lambda changes significantly with time for a halo's major progenitor. It typically has a sharp increase due to major mergers and a steady decline during periods of gradual accretion of small satellites. The model predicts that, on average, the lambda of 10(12) M-. halos that had major mergers after redshift z = 3 should be substantially larger than the lambda of those that did not. Perhaps surprisingly, this suggests that halos that host later forming elliptical galaxies should rotate faster than halos of spiral galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据