4.6 Article

A uvbyCaHβ ANALYSIS OF THE OLD OPEN CLUSTER, NGC 6819

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 148, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/51

关键词

open clusters and associations: general; open clusters and associations: individual (NGC 6819)

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0321247, AST-1211621, AST-1211699]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1211621, 1211699] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NGC 6819 is a richly populated, older open cluster situated within the Kepler field. A CCD survey of the cluster on the uvbyCaH beta system, coupled with proper-motion membership, has been used to isolate 382 highly probable, single-star unevolved main-sequence members over a 20' field centered on the cluster. From 278 F dwarfs with high precision photometry in all indices, a mean reddening of E(b - y) = 0.117 +/- 0.005 or E(B - V) = 0.160 +/- 0.007 is derived, where the standard errors of the mean include both internal errors and the photometric zero-point uncertainty. With the reddening fixed, the metallicity derived from the same 278 stars is [Fe/H] = -0.116 +/- 0.101 from m(1) and -0.055 +/- 0.033 from hk, for a weighted average of [Fe/H] = -0.06 +/- 0.04, where the quoted standard errors of the mean include the internal errors from the photometric scatter plus the uncertainty in the photometric zero points. If metallicity is derived using individual reddening values for each star to account for potential reddening variation across the face of the cluster, the analogous result is unchanged. The cluster members at the turnoff of the color magnitude diagram are used to test and confirm the recently discovered variation in reddening across the face of the cluster, with a probable range in the variation of Delta E(B - V) = 0.045 +/- 0.015. With the slightly higher reddening and lower [Fe/H] compared to commonly adopted values, isochrone fitting leads to an age of 2.3 +/- 0.2 Gyr for an apparent modulus of (m - M) = 12.40 +/- 0.12.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据